
01:35:50
@Todd, how is “Cider" spelled?

01:36:37
Sidre

01:37:06
Sidre is part of Axom: https://github.com/llnl/axom

01:37:13
thanks, my google-fu was failing.

01:37:17
docs: https://axom.readthedocs.io/en/develop/axom/sidre/docs/sphinx/index.html

01:38:20
conduit has been key for some of the mesh sharing through sidre: https://github.com/llnl/conduit

01:38:27
specifically this part: https://llnl-conduit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/blueprint_mesh.html#mesh-blueprint

01:46:51
not using any metrics is also dangerous

01:47:42
Using metics in isolation is dangerous. Developing a greater model involving several metrics could be useful.

01:47:54
USRSE includes national labs

01:48:01
but not sure that's the same as what you are proposing

01:49:04
Simple metrics can be ok if there is intention and around those metrics. “# of releases" is a terrible metric, but if everyone is thoughful and recognizes that if you abuse it, you'll lose it, it can help provide recognition (relative to the current # of papers metric)

01:49:31
As # of papers is no less "gameable" than number of releases

01:54:47
Thank you!